Probability | Science2be

Tag Archives: Probability

Simon Shnoll’s Groundbreaking Insights on Measurement and Reality

In a revealing interview, Simon Shnoll discusses his extensive research on measurement anomalies in biochemical experiments, challenging conventional scientific understanding and suggesting a deeper connection between time and reality.

1. Introduction

Simon El’evich Shnoll, a Russian biophysicist, spent decades investigating measurement anomalies, particularly in biochemical and physical processes. His observations suggest that random processes such as radioactive decay exhibit periodic and structured fluctuations, hinting at deep cosmophysical influences. His work challenges the fundamental assumption of measurement independence and randomness, proposing a revolutionary understanding of time and reality.

2. Early Career and Initial Discoveries

Shnoll’s journey into these anomalies began in September 1951 when he started working on a nuclear project. Despite the radioactive environment, he conducted biochemical experiments, supported by his mentors. However, what he discovered fundamentally challenged established scientific methods and interpretations.

3. The Anomaly in Measurements

During his experiments, Shnoll noticed deviations from the expected Gaussian distribution. Instead of a smooth bell curve, his data revealed structured fluctuations. The standard expectation for measurements follows: $P(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(x - \mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}$ ,

where:

x represents measured values,
$\mu$ is the mean,
$\sigma$ is the standard deviation.

However, Shnoll found that experimental results did not consistently follow this distribution, exhibiting periodic deviations. Even after averaging multiple measurements: $X = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} x_i$ , the fluctuations persisted, suggesting an underlying structured phenomenon.

4. The Shift in Perspective

As he continued, Shnoll realized that time played a crucial role in his measurements. He introduced the concept of “parallel probes,” where experiments were conducted under the same conditions but at different times. This method revealed that measurement distributions depended on when they were recorded, leading to: $P(X, t) \neq P(X, t+\Delta t)$ .

This finding directly contradicted conventional assumptions that measurement distributions should be time-invariant under identical conditions.

5. Parallel vs. Serial Probes

To further investigate, Shnoll systematically compared measurements taken simultaneously at different locations versus those taken sequentially in the same location. He found that parallel measurements exhibited stronger correlations than serial ones, reinforcing the idea that each moment in time has unique physical properties influencing measurement outcomes.

6. Experimental Evidence

Over 25 years, Shnoll and his team conducted thousands of experiments, measuring fluctuations in:

Alpha decay of 239Pu and 241Am
Beta decay of tritium
Biochemical reaction rates

Each dataset exhibited periodicity linked to external cosmophysical factors, suggesting that stochastic processes are influenced by cosmic and geophysical conditions rather than being purely random.

7. Possible Explanations

Several hypotheses attempt to explain the Shnoll Effect:

Cosmic Ray Influence: Variations in cosmic ray flux due to planetary motion.
Gravitational and Inertial Effects: Influences from planetary alignments and Earth’s motion.
Quantum Entanglement with the Universe: Suggesting nonlocal correlations in physical processes.

Despite these hypotheses, no widely accepted theoretical framework fully explains the observed periodic structures.

8. Implications for Fundamental Physics

Shnoll’s findings challenge key assumptions in physics:

Randomness of Decay: If decay rates are influenced by cosmic factors, the assumption of purely stochastic behavior in quantum mechanics needs revision.
Time-Dependent Measurements: Measurement outcomes depend on global and cosmophysical conditions, contradicting traditional metrology principles.
New Perspectives in Metrology: Precision measurements in physics and chemistry may need to account for celestial influences.

9. References

S. E. Shnoll, Cosmophysical Factors in Stochastic Processes, American Research Press, 2009.
S. E. Shnoll et al., “Regular Variations of the Fine Structure of Stochastic Distributions as a Consequence of Cosmophysical Influences,” Physics – Uspekhi, 2003.
S. E. Shnoll et al., “Experiments with Rotating Collimators Cutting Out Pencil of Alpha-Particles at Radioactive Decay of Pu-239 Evidence Sharp Anisotropy of Space,” arXiv preprint, 2005.

10. Conclusion: A New Worldview

Simon Shnoll’s research leads to a radical shift in our perception of time and measurement. His insistence that every moment has unique physical properties challenges the very foundation of scientific inquiry. As he reflects on his life’s work, Shnoll encourages scientists to remain open to revolutionary ideas that redefine our understanding of the universe.

His findings suggest that stochastic processes may be deeply entangled with the cosmic fabric, urging a reconsideration of randomness, measurement, and time in the broader context of physical reality.

Tags: consciousness, philosophy, Physics, Probability, science

Comments Leave a Comment
Categories Academia, Advanced Physics Topics, Education and Science, Experimental Science & Data Analysis, Quantum Mechanics, Radioactivity

Deciphering Uncertainty: Jacob Bernoulli’s Legacy in Probability Theory

7 Mar

In this series, our primary aim is to demystify and popularize intricate mathematical structures, making them accessible to the everyday individual, both aspirational learners and mindful engineers. Even though mathematics is seen as mysterious and abstract, it is full of deep symmetry, profound truths, and beautiful things. Gaining mathematics literacy improves our ability to solve problems and creates new opportunities across many industries. A mathematically literate society is more powerful and capable of making the most use of equations and numbers to improve living standards and get a better understanding of the universe.

The 17th-century Swiss mathematician Jacob Bernoulli is commonly referred to as the “Father of Probability” because of the fundamental contributions he made to the science of probability and to mathematics as a whole. The moniker “Father of Uncertainty Quantification” may not be used often, but it accurately captures Bernoulli’s contribution to the creation of mathematical instruments for managing and comprehending uncertainty.

Contributions to Uncertainty Quantification:

Law of Large Numbers: In his posthumously released book “Ars Conjectandi” in 1713, Jacob Bernoulli made the most important contribution to the area of probability and uncertainty quantification: he formulated the Law of Large Numbers. This theorem ensures that, as the number of trials rises, the average of the outcomes becomes closer to the predicted value, hence lowering uncertainty in predictions. It is fundamental to understanding the behaviour of averages of random variables.
Binary Systems and Bernoulli Trials: He investigated binary systems, or what are now known as Bernoulli trials, in which there are only two potential outcomes (such as tossing a coin). The foundation for comprehending random processes and estimating the probability of various outcomes was established by this study, which is essential for calculating uncertainty in systems with probabilistic rather than deterministic outcomes.
Combination Theory: Combination theory, which is essential for computing probabilities and comprehending the distribution of outcomes in complicated systems, saw major advancements under Bernoulli’s leadership. This work is crucial for industries like banking, insurance, and engineering that deal with risk and uncertainty.
Risk Management: Bernoulli’s contributions to probability theory gave rise to the instruments that actuarial science and risk management use today. His research makes it possible to evaluate and quantify risks in ambiguous situations, which improves decision-making in these situations.
Psychology of Decision Making: In addition, Bernoulli discussed the psychological implications of making decisions in the face of uncertainty, which paved the way for the eventual exploration of the Bernoulli principle, commonly known as utility theory. This principle introduces the idea of individual risk tolerance into the measurement of uncertainty by recommending that decision-makers compare the projected utility values of hazardous and uncertain prospects in order to make their selection.

Impact on Uncertainty Quantification:

Numerous fields that deal with uncertainty have been profoundly and permanently impacted by the work of Jacob Bernoulli on probability theory. His mathematical formulas establish the foundation for contemporary statistics, risk assessment, and decision sciences by offering a means of modelling, analysing, and making predictions about systems with uncertain outcomes. A key figure in the history of uncertainty quantification, Bernoulli’s concepts have enabled scientists, engineers, economists, and decision-makers to use a methodical and scientific approach to managing the unknown.

The Law of Large Numbers is Jacob Bernoulli’s most famous contribution to the understanding and measurement of uncertainty, even though he did not formulate it as an equation like we would do today. Rather, his work established the basic ideas that later mathematicians would formalise into mathematical equations. The Law of Large Numbers essentially deals with the outcomes of conducting an experiment many times. It states that the average of the results from many trials should be near to the expected value, and that the average of the results should tend to approach the expected value as more trials are conducted.

Law of Large Numbers (Conceptual Explanation)

While Bernoulli did not provide a modern equation for this law, the essence of his discovery can be expressed in a simplified modern notation as follows: Given a large number of trials n, the average result $[\bar{X}_n = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i]$ of these trials for a random variable X with expected value $latex E(X)=μ$, the Law of Large Numbers tells us that:

$\bar{X}_n = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i \rightarrow \mu \quad \text{as} \quad n \rightarrow \infty$

Examples Illustrating Bernoulli’s Concept of Uncertainty

Example 1: Coin Tossing

Consider the act of tossing a fair coin. Each toss has two possible outcomes: heads or tails. If we define success as landing on heads, the expected probability of success p in each trial is 0.5.

If you toss the coin a large number of times, say n=1000, the Law of Large Numbers suggests that the proportion of heads ( $[\bar{X}_{1000} = \frac{1}{1000} \sum_{i=1}^{1000} X_i]$ ) will be very close to 0.5. The more you toss the coin, the closer the proportion will get to the expected value of 0.5.

Example 2: Rolling a Die

Imagine rolling a fair six-sided die. The expected value E(X) of the outcome is 3.5, since each side has an equal probability of landing face up, and the average (mean) of all possible outcomes (1 through 6) is 3.5.

If you roll the die a large number of times, the average value of the results $[\bar{X}_{n} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i]$ should approach 3.5, demonstrating the Law of Large Numbers. For instance, if n=10000 rolls, the average result should be very close to 3.5.

Bernoulli’s Trials

Another significant concept introduced by Bernoulli is the Bernoulli trial, which is a random experiment where there are only two possible outcomes (e.g., success or failure). The probability of success in each trial is p and the probability of failure is (1−p). Though Bernoulli’s Trials themselves do not directly describe uncertainty, they form the basis of many statistical methods for dealing with probabilistic events.

Bernoulli’s Equation for a Single Trial’s Expected Value and Variance

For a Bernoulli trial with success probability p, the expected value E(X) and variance Var(X) are given by:

$E(X)=p$
Var(X)=p (1−p)

These fundamental concepts and the mathematical framework Bernoulli developed form the basis of probability theory and the quantification of uncertainty, influencing countless applications in science, engineering, economics, and decision theory.

Application in the Stock Market:

Expected Return and Variance in Portfolio Theory:

Modern portfolio theory, which evaluates how investors may optimise their portfolios through diversification to maximise anticipated return for a given level of risk, is based on Bernoulli’s insights into probability and risk.

Expected Return of a Portfolio: The computation of a portfolio’s anticipated return involves averaging the projected returns of each individual item in the portfolio, with the weights indicating the relative importance of each asset:

$E(R_p)=\sum_{i=1}^n w_i E(R_i)$ .

Portfolio Variance: In addition to accounting for the variances of individual assets, the variance of the portfolio’s return, which serves as a gauge of risk, also considers the covariance between pairs of assets:

$Var(R_p)=\sum_{i=1}^n\sum_{j=1}^nw_iw_jCov(R_i,R_j)$ ,

where $Cov(R_i,R_j)$ is the covariance between the returns of assets i and j; $E(R_p)$ is the expected return of the portfolio; $w_i$ is the weight of the ith asset in the portfolio; $E(R_i)$ is the expected return of the ith asset; n is the number of assets in the portfolio.

By utilising Bernoulli’s Law of Large Numbers and his seminal work on probability, investors may better comprehend and control the inherent unpredictability of financial markets.

Application in Engineering:

Reliability Engineering and Risk Assessment:

In engineering, failure rates and component dependability are predicted using statistical techniques and the Law of Large Numbers.

Failure Rate (λ) Calculation: In reliability engineering, the failure rate (λ) of a component is often estimated from historical failure data, $\lambda=\frac{Total operational time}{Number of failures}$
System Reliability: For a series system of n independent components, the system reliability (Rs) can be calculated as the product of the reliabilities of individual components: $Rs=\Pi_{i=1}^n Ri$ ,where Ri is the reliability of component i.
Application in Quality Control (Six Sigma):The Six Sigma methodology in quality control uses statistical methods to reduce defects and variability in manufacturing processes. It aims to have processes operate within a certain range of standard deviations (σ) from the mean to minimize the defect rate. The process capability index (Cp) is a measure used in Six Sigma to quantify how well a process fits within its specification limits:
$Cp=\frac{Specification Upper Limit-Specification Lower Limit}{6 \sigma}$ :
σ is the standard deviation of the process output.

These instances highlight how Bernoulli’s theories of probability and statistical analysis are applied directly to the engineering and stock market domains, managing uncertainty and maximising results.